KeithH2
Registered user
Registered: 05-2009
Posts: 193
|
|
|
Re: Falls
It is indeed subjective Martin but one of the advantages of LF is the ability to crop without losing too much quality. Too many years ago to remember a wise old photog told me to let the picture determine the format, not the film/paper format and imho he was right, we tend to get get too uptight about not wasting neg/paper area but hey-ho it's a whole new world now.
--- Keith
======================
"..Nothing would be done at all if a man waited to do it so well that no one could find fault with it..."
John Henry Newman
|
19/Jan/16, 9:25 pm
|
Link to this post
Send Email to KeithH2
Send PM to KeithH2
|
martinimages
Head Administrator
Registered: 01-2006
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 6449
|
|
|
Re: Falls
Eye lad it is , as we say upt north
--- "After that shutter closes it’s all over. The physical light captured on film is all that is left, a history of light preserved in chemical form, and I have to move on to the next one."
http://martinhensonphotography.co.uk
|
19/Jan/16, 9:36 pm
|
Link to this post
Send Email to martinimages
Send PM to martinimages
MSN
Blog
|
eternumviti
Registered user
Registered: 08-2014
Posts: 1023
|
|
|
Re: Falls
I don't agree with Keith, I think the slight loss of focus or blur in the foreground retains the dynamic of the moving water.
|
20/Jan/16, 1:30 pm
|
Link to this post
Send Email to eternumviti
Send PM to eternumviti
Blog
|